Sunday, May 07, 2006

The Da Vinci Code and Mohammed?

When The Da Vinci Code opens in theaters on May 19th, it certainly will garner a great number of tickets sold for what may be the most anticipated movie of the year. Truly no other book, other than the Bible itself, has had such a big impact in terms of copies sold and interest in historical religiosity so far this decade. The Catholic Church and Opus Dei organization are already on a defensive campaign to spin what is perceived to be negative PR from the book and certainly the movie's release itself.

Author Dan Brown himself says that "The Da Vinci Code is a novel and therefore a work of fiction" and the goal for the reader is "that the story would serve as a catalyst and a springboard for people to discuss the important topics of faith, religion, and history. "

A lot of Christians are seeing the release of the movie as an opportunity to discuss religion with those unfamiliar with their faith, and this surely is a great chance for evangelism to take place. Many sites have also commented on the book's impact on Christianity- Christianity Today and Campus Crusade for Christ both having information readily available for those seeking truth.

All the above to put forth a simple query: What if The Da Vinci Code had at its basis the question of religious history with relation to Mohammed instead of Jesus? How would the Islamic community have handled it? With all the outrage from the Islamic community regarding the publishing of editorial cartoons depicting Mohammed in various situations recently can you imagine the outcry from the Arabic speaking world? Does this speak volumes about the sensitivity and tolerance of both faiths to questioning and the attitudes of those who follow both?

Day Without an Immigrant = Absent From School?

I would like to applaud those that took to the streets, stayed at home, or chose other peaceful protests to bring to a head the importance of the issue of immigration here in this country. Truly, we are at a crossroads with how we handle the vast number of individuals who desire entrance into this country, often with the motive of giving themselves or their children a better life. That in and of itself is honorable, and it says a lot as to the accomplishment of this country from the fledgling society we started out back in 1776, when we declared independence from England by stating "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." However, that success has also driven the immigration issue we face today- since the United States is perceived to be the country where one must go to achieve a level of economic and personal security, with the relative safety of respect for cultural individuality thus fostering our populous diversity, there exists large numbers wanting to cross our borders, both legally and illegally.

Many come and work hard to achieve these goals. In fact, we have the dilemma of wanting cheaply produced and thus cheaply sold products in this country, as evidenced by the impact the Wal-Mart concept has had on consumer shopping. No where is this more evident than in two different areas in our economy- agriculture and construction.

Last fall, there was fear of a worker shortage in Arizona, where during November 35,000-40,000 workers are needed to harvest the produce- lettuce, cauliflower, broccoli and celery- necessary to deliver to your corner grocery store. Like a head of broccoli for under $2? Then you have just voted for allowing illegal aliens across our borders by using your wallet. The same goes for the keeping the price of fruit, cotton, and other agricultural products low. In a time of $3 a gallon gas, I think an increase in the price of food and socks would surely make people stand up and take notice.

Then there is the construction industry. In many parts of the country the housing market has been booming thanks to low interest rates and the large number of individuals wanting to buy homes. But tell me, have you seen many non-Hispanic faces on the work crews? How many of your friends would work 10+ hour days 6-7 days a week for less than $15/hour? Take into consideration that a lot of these people are also sending a good portion of their incomes back across the border for their immediate and extended family members. Their dedication to hard work and for their family is something we can all learn from.

This leads us back to the "Day Without an Immigrant" 6 days ago. Again, it seemed like those most affected by immigration law would want less attention drawn to them, for if any change is made to further determine the legality of a person's presence here in this country, those that would be at risk would not want to stand out by having their absence noted in the workplace. But, taking a stand for something you believe is something this country was founded on (see above), and this shows the incorporation of American ideals into the diverse ethnic and cultural peoples who chose to make their presence known. If these same people can become legal citizens, can you imagine what their presence can do in the polls if they continue to take their civic responsibility so seriously?

However, one thing does show me the Americanization of the immigrants may have been too complete. Almost everywhere you will read that those here both legally and illegally are here to better themselves and/or their children. In fact, three high school students, all undocumented who are here with their undocumented families, stated in an NPR interview on May 2 that they reason the United States should allow them to stay was that they were "studying hard" in school. But why were they out of school on May 1? Does this not contradict their reason for staying?

Here locally it was reported that the absence rate for Hispanic students in Metro Nashville schools was 30%. Again, if parents of minority students, some of whom are certainly immigrants and here to better the lives of their children, would appreciate the fact that in order to accomplish that goal attendance in school is an absolute necessity. Has school attendance, as it has to many of the American students who are natives of this country, become a convenience to these students as well?

I, as an educated American would call this contradiction ironic. It is a pity that those who were taking a stance may be missing the point of their purpose in being here, and may be more like us than they know.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Islam vs. the World

This is the first of what I hope will be many posts on the radicalism seen in the Muslim world today.

Today an Austalian news company ran a report of new photos of the Abu Gharib abuse scandal, and according to the report on MSN, the Muslim world in once again "inflamed". In fact, here is a quote from the report:

“This is truly American ugliness that no other country in the world can compete with,” Yemeni journalist Saleh al-Humaidi told Reuters.“The Americans ought to apologize to mankind for their government’s lie to the world that it is fighting for freedom and that it came to Iraq to save it from Saddam Hussein’s oppression,” he said.

Now surely what happened at Abu Gharib is indefensible on all fronts. The man responsible, Army Spec. Charles Graner, has been tried and convicted and is now serving 10 years in prison for his atrocities. Justice has been served.

But how can this be "ugliness that no other country in the world compete with"? So Saddam's gassing of the Kurds in northern Iraq is not ugly? So the children walking to school this morning that were killed by a terrorists' bomb in Iraq this morning is not ugly? So the genocide that occurred in the Sudan and Somalia is not ugly? So the killing of thousands at the world trade center is not ugly? So the Yemini bombing of the USS Cole is not ugly?

The statement, from a Muslim, condemns the US on a political level for something that is more a result of his personal hatred and intolerance, something that his culture and many in his faith feel is defensible in their twisted, self-righteous, bigoted way of thinking if it occurs by their hands or is according to their "purpose". If they kill people, it is ok; if we torture people, it is the extreme in "ugliness".

Sounds to me like the pot is calling the kettle black, Mr. al-Humaidi. Police yourself and establish some sort of tolerance for views that are other than your own and maybe you can have some credibility with your comments.

Sunday, January 15, 2006

Playing Football Causes Suicide?

This week's Sports Illustrated covered a high school in Maine who had 5 players or ex-players from the football team commit suicide in the past 2+ years. Here is a synopsis:

In the article from E.M. Swift, Winthrop High School's first suicide was on April 10th, 2003, when Jason Marston, a 15 year old backup varsity player who was reportedly popular with his friends and teammates became distraught after he had an argument with his girlfriend, and after locking himself in his room for that evening he snuck outside during the night and shot himself in the head in the backyard. He had no classic warning signs- he had a stable home life, no indication of use/abuse of drugs or alcohol, no history of depression. His father eulogized him wearing his football jersey, and the next year the football team wore his number on their helmets.

The second suicide occurred 10 months later on February 17, 2004, when 20 year old Lee St. Hilaire shot himself in the stomach with a shotgun in his apartment he shared with his girlfriend in Bangor. He was a celebrated quarterback for Winthrop High, leading the team to a 35-6 record while playing and winning the state championship in 2000. Athletically he was not your typical prototype quarterback, and flamed out after trying to play collegiately at Maine and smaller Husson College in Bangor, disenchanted with the "structure" of college ball and also the taste of losing. He brought a little more baggage to the table however- he was the product of a divorced family and chose to live with his girlfriend's family in high school. He reportedly "kept things to himself" and was "defensive about how he was perceived in the community", and while at Maine did not like the idea of a curfew or being told when he could not go home to Winthrop, a freedom a college athlete gives up to play at that level. He also had conversations with his ex-high school football coach about the direction his life was going and what he was going to do in the future. Again no drugs or alcohol were noted.

The next suicide came 11 months later on January 8, 2005, when Bryant (Mox) Donovan, another 19 year old ex-Winthrop player, hung himself. Donovan idolized St. Hilaire, having many clippings from his days as a player, where Donovan was his backup, adorned on his wall at home. Donovan was reported to be "devastated" by Hilaire's death. However, Donovan did show some signs of being at risk. His parents divorced during his freshman year of high school, and his coaches report that he "had a hard time dealing with that." He was kicked off the team his senior year for violating team rules. The night he killed himself, he had been drinking, and an open whiskey bottle was found beside his body.

Lee Ellis died 3 days later, a 24 year old ex-lineman, also by hanging himself. Ellis and Donovan were 5 years apart in school so they barely knew each other, and he had a lot of signs for being at risk- he had a history of depression and a grandmother who committed suicide, was $2000 behind in child support, and had already tried to kill himself twice before succeeding on January 11, 2005.

Chad Garwood also hung himself, on June 11, 2005. He seemed to be a person who had a lot going for him- a top student and star football and basketball player, he was admitted to Colby, a very selective college in the state of Maine. He played football there his freshman year but struggled academically, and did not return for his sophomore year. He moved on and enrolled at the University of Southern Maine, but as a student only, since the school did not have a football team. When Donovan died, Garwood was already struggling with his parents separation- specifically his father, who struggles with depression- and that "double blow" was hard on him emotionally. Still dealing with this, he also struggled with his "failure" at Colby, and prompted a school nurse to have a Winthrop assistant coach call on Garwood to assess how he was doing. He struggled with talking about himself, "clamming up" when the subject of conversation turned to him, but he promised the coach he would call if he ever thought of hurting himself. He began heavily drinking alcohol for about 6 months prior to his death, and had consumed a 6 pack of beer the night he killed himself.

On November 5, 2005, the football team lost another Winthrop player and 2003 graduate, when Jason Ruman was killed in a motor vehicle accident. He had also been drinking heavily that night, and lost control of his car at high speed and flipped over, striking a utility pole. Thankfully, two female passengers also in the car survived the crash.


Six deaths. Five suicides, one drunk driving accident. Five men all under the age of 24, who should be in the prime of their lives and experiencing the excitement and enjoyment of freedom and adulthood, instead being mourned by their families and their community. The article goes into detail about how the community was overwhelmed with what seemed to be "copycat" behavior. Looking externally, they saw the connection that all were male, played football for Winthrop, and died within a two and a half year period (excluding the drunk driving incident). Here's what happened:
  • The person who plays football was profiled- men who would not talk about suicide, who would not express themselves emotionally, who had been "trained" to "suck it up" and "play hurt", to show no weaknesses or vulnerability, play football. And they were action oriented, demonstrating such in their athletic prowess and with the success they had with killing themselves.
  • The environment was examined- the football coach had kept a board of clippings of players who died young (not only suicide, including those in uniform or in traffic accidents) in the locker room, the players wore Marston's number that year after his death, and St. Hilaire's memorial service was held in the school gym. There was an article in the Augusta paper wondering if the "pressure of fan expectations" on the team strained these players, making them more at risk to themselves.
  • The coaches were examined- fortunately the only good story worth printing. The coaches appeared to be model mentors, reaching out to the young men both while they were playing for them and often for many years afterward, a pattern that was kept even though there were changes in the staff during this period.
  • The school and the community addressed the issue- the coaches ramped up their efforts at communication with the players, the athletic director worked towards getting students to utilize resources while notifying adults of at risk behavior, and memorials that were requested for the fallen students have been declined by the school.

What did they surmise? That even though the pattern amongst the dead is that they are male and between the ages of 15-24 (the demographic where suicide is the third leading cause of death), the community, and the article itself, concludes that football may predispose males to killing themselves.

Here is where I start to have a problem. I agree with the findings that can be logically traced above, but I think that the writer and the community failed to make some very important points. First, what about the issue of divorce? While it may be taboo to bring it up in today's progressive and relativistic society, parent's who choose to break their wedding vows are modeling the selfish distaste for the value of commitment they are trying to hold their children up to. By saying "Do what I say and not as I do", they potentially demonstrated that value is relative to the person, and is accountable to no one else. So why should someone who is planning on taking their life express their feelings to someone else, even a parent, because in their mind it is an agreeable alternative to struggles that all people of this age range inevitably experience?

My second problem is with alcohol consumption and apparent abuse in minors. Emotional instability is a hallmark for this age demographic, and while many think that drinking alcohol is a right given that they are "exploring" during this time in their lives, the combination of instability and drinking can be deadly. As a resident assistant in college, I was repeatedly trained to recognize the warning signs of suicidal behavior, and my two instances in "talking someone down" both involved relationship break-ups- emotional instability- and heavy alcohol intoxication. The community above has done many of the right things in trying to stop this rash of behavior, but they, and the writer, glaringly fail to bring this point up at all, other than to state the fact that the male had been drinking that day/night. Perhaps the attention to this detail by the parents, the school, the coaches, and the community may limit the next fatality in Winthrop.

Could these two factors have played a role in this as well?